Anglican Watch

Sexual harassment allegations emerge about the Rev. Stephen McWhorter

the Rev. Stephen McWhorter
Note from editor: On January 9, 2022, we contacted both the Episcopal Diocese of Alabama and St. Luke’s, the church with which McWhorter currently is associated, asking for comment. So far, we have received no response.
Let us hope that all involved, including the Episcopal diocese of Virginia (DioVA), act with integrity and transparency in this matter, including caring for those hurt by McWhorter’s alleged actions. And for the record, an apology without more is not acceptable. Nor is it Christian.
For that matter, the usual DioVA response of, “protect the church. Don’t get too involved,” doesn’t cut it. The church provided the credentialing and recognition that McWhorter allegedly exploited. It thus falls to the church to ensure that the underlying power dynamic is respected.

Anglican Watch recently learned from multiple sources of allegations of sexual harassment involving the Rev. Stephen McWhorter. McWhorter is a priest canonically resident in the Episcopal Diocese of Alabama.

The allegations involve women, who have shared with Anglican Watch allegations of egregious sexual misconduct, including multiple instances of inappropriate conduct directed towards these women.


Ordained in the diocese of West Virginia in 1967, McWhorter is known to have served for many years as the rector of St. David’s Episcopal, in Ashburn Virginia.

While there, he bloviated about the church’s gurgling baptistry, located in the center of the church’s nave, and designed for full immersion. “The baptistery . . . is at the center of our life,” he said. “There is psychological and spiritual depth to going into the water and being buried with Christ to share in his resurrection,” McWhorter said. He said that watching the rite in a large baptistery can also be inspirational to the congregation. “It didn’t make sense to have a large church with a baptistery the size of a birdbath,” he told the Washington Post in a 2005 story.

In 2008, McWhorter, then canonically resident in the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia, accepted a call as the interim of St. Thomas’ Church, Birmingham. By 2010, McWhorter was serving as interim of Christ Church, Frederica on St. Simons Island, Georgia.

And just in case we weren’t impressed by McWhorter’s baptismal theology, he has taught ethics at the UAB Medical School, as well as offering seminars on teaching medical students to think ethically.

Pretty rich, huh?


The allegations received here at Anglican Watch are detailed, specific, and ugly. They suggest an individual devoid of empathy, unconcerned about the welfare of others, and who has engaged in an ongoing pattern of misconduct. In other words, they implicate narcissism, sociopathy and a serial predator. That said, no one here at Anglican Watch is a mental health expert, and thus we are unable to do more than share our take on this matter.

Out of respect for the individuals hurt by this conduct, we are not going to publish names, dates, or details. But we believe the allegations to be credible. We believe the women who have come forward to share their stories.

Even more troubling is the fact that Episcopal bishop Shannon Johnston, who was the bishop involved when these allegations first emerged, is fully aware of these allegations. But Anglican Watch has seen no evidence that Johnston has provided the pastoral response to victims that is required when, as here, a Title IV clergy disciplinary complaint has been made. Indeed, he has reportedly refused to discuss the matter with victims on the basis that the matter is confidential — despite the fact that Title IV expressly provides that the bishop may waive confidentiality in order to provide a pastoral response. Indeed, it very much appears that Johnson has attempted to cover up the matter.

The trauma McWhorter has caused is not inconsequential. Anglican Watch has learned of profound psychological and emotional distress on the part of those McWhorter has hurt.

And keep in mind that the distress resulting from misconduct doesn’t just effect direct victims. It extends to family members, friends, onlookers, bystanders, and even often members of the abuser’s own family.

So why are the dioceses in question not taking the matter seriously?

Lack of accountability

So why is someone like this still serving as a priest? That is a fair question, and it is the position of Anglican Watch that there is no reason why McWhorter should still be a priest.

Repeat: McWhorter should no longer be a priest. Nor should he be in any position of trust.

His conduct is not a one-off mistake, nor a spur-of-the-moment incident of misconduct. Instead, it is a pattern involving the inherent disparity of power between a priest and lay women in the church, and McWhorter’s exploitation of that power imbalance. It is the conduct of a ruthless, ugly and despicable human being, utterly indifferent to the welfare of others.

In that regard, handling the matter in secrecy serves only to perpetuate harm. As Christians, we are called to bring light to the darkness. We are not called to hide the darkness in the darkness.

And while Anglican Watch has learned that there may be a pastoral directive prohibiting McWhorter from again supervising parish staff, that still leaves McWhorter free to abuse his position in other settings.

Consider: Youth groups. Non-Episcopal settings (like medical schools). Summer camps. Cruise ships. Youth counseling. Marital counseling. The possibilities are endless and deeply troubling.

Given this lack of accountability, would you want your spouse, your partner, your son, your daughter, your friend, or your neighbor having a pastoral relationship with McWhorter? It is doubtful that any rational actor would.

And what about someone vulnerable, like a victim of prior abuse? Someone with developmental disabilities? Someone with mental illness? Or someone facing great trauma, like the loss of an immediate family member?

Moreover, in what other profession can you engage in a pattern of sexual harassment and keep your job? Any response other than removing McWhorter from ministry is too little, too late. And it puts the lie to the Episcopal Church’s claim to take #metoo and #churchtoo seriously.

We also want to add an important reminder in this and similar situations: Clergy are always responsible for maintaining boundaries. Full stop.

Far too often, victims question themselves, with things like, “Maybe I was too friendly,” or “I should have said no earlier.” Those are common and understandable reactions, but they are mistaken. Clergy occupy the position of perceived power, and are always responsible for maintaining boundaries. There are no exceptions.

We are also concerned about McWhorter’s changes in canonical residency. While there may be good reasons for these changes, many retired priests simply retain their original canonical residency as a matter of convenience. Thus, the suspicion here at Anglican Watch is that either McWhorter is trying to put his past behind him, or this is a bad case of pass the trash. Or answer C — all of the above.

At the highest level, the McWhorter situation illustrates several great challenges facing the Episcopal Church. These include:

  • Lack of transparency.
  • Lack of accountability.
  • Excessive authority vested in bishops, who often lack adequate training and may face conflicts of interest due to their pastoral role.
  • The disempowerment of victims of abuse. In this situation, we have seen zero concern for the women allegedly hurt by McWhorter’s predatory behavior. At the same time, we have seen far too much concern for McWhorter’s reputation and that of the church. Indeed, once there is a substantiated claim of sexual harassment, there is — or should be — no expectation of privacy on the part of the perpetrator.

Ironically, folks like Shannon Johnston don’t understand that, by handling situations like this behind closed doors, they actually cause long-term harm to the reputation of the church.

Consider: If you were one of the medical students who was taught what passes for ethics in McWhorter’s world, what is your reaction when you learn that McWhorter is allegedly sexually harassing women?

Not only will you question what you were taught, but you will ultimately question the ethical reference point of the Episcopal Church. That is particularly the case when you compare the church’s conduct with that of corporate America, where such conduct is grounds for immediate termination.

Nor is McWhorter’s story all that exceptional. Far too many rectors—usually older males—wrap themselves in the mantle of clericalism, where they say and do whatever they want, and hurt whomever they want, with no supervision, no accountability, and no repercussions.

Shifting gears, a word to the inevitable attorneys: These are allegations, and nothing here has been adjudicated in a court of law. But the allegations come from credible sources, and we believe them.

We further call on the Diocese of Alabama, where McWhorter is canonically resident, to immediately remove McWhorter from any and all exercise of ministry. Not in a month. Not in a week. Now.

Church records indicate that McWhorter is a resident of Sylacauga Alabama and is associated with St. Luke’s Episcopal, in Birmingham.

Worshippers beware.

Women beware.

World beware.

Anglican Watch welcomes comments from others who may have been harassed, abused, or mistreated by McWhorter, or by other clergy. Your identity will be kept confidential. You are also welcome to contact Anglican Watch directly. 


  1. Very typical. From the church, expect the silent treatment. McWhorter will probably hire some lawyer to threaten and bluster. The hierarchy will close ranks, say everything is confidential, and try to cover things up. Those hurt will be ignored, blamed, dismissed, told they are mentally ill, and more.

    The Episcopal church is so broken I don’t even know where to start.

  2. I was a member of St. David’s Episcopal in Ashburn Virginia when Father Stephen McWhorter served there. I am dishearten to read of the current allegations against him. And hope they are proven false, I have fond memories of him from that time period and have only the highest regard for his service to the people of the church. My prayers go out to him in this difficult time in his life . Sending him my very best wishes!

    1. Thanks for your kind comments. I personally know the adult female in this situation and she deals with really severe trauma.
      We’ve also offered Stephen the opportunity to respond to these allegations but got no response. -Ed.

  3. I attended the first service on an Easter Sunday when St. David’s Episcopal church was just a forest, witnessed the church and preschool buildings built, served on the Vestry, and served on a Search Committee for Father Stephen’s replacement. I knew Father Stephen for years, both as a church goer and via multiple organizational volunteer committees.

    As a self employed businessman, I was very conscious and aware of potential sexual harassment issues and nuisances not only between myself and employees, but amongst employees, or employees and clients. I understood the law and what could be construed as sexual harassment.

    I say emphatically, I never observed nor “heard through the grapevine” anything that could be construed as sexual harassment and question the veracity of this article

    1. Paul,

      Thank you for your comments.

      Several points relevant to these allegations:

      – We have received allegations from multiple individuals, including a male, who alleges unwanted advances from McWhorter while the latter served a parish in Pittsburgh; we have also received very specific allegations from a female church worker who worked with McMhorter while the latter was canonically resident in the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia. We find both reports convincing and credible.

      – The female church worker is continuing to receive care for severe trauma related to her allegations.

      – There is strong evidence of multiple Title IV complaints against McWhorter over these issues.

      – We have directly contacted McWhorter for comment and have been met with silence.

      – We are more than willing to come to the defense of clergy — and anyone else — experiencing bullying. This is evinced by our defense of the rector of St. Paul’s Montvale and faithful members of the parish. Thus, while much of our coverage involves clergy misconduct, we have no bias against clergy and assess all allegations on the basis of the facts in front of us.

      We therefore reiterate our offer: If any portion of this article is inaccurate, we invite McWhorter to promptly notify us of same.

      We also note that the whole, “I never saw anything,” approach, combined with a lack of concern for the victims, is far too common in these situations.

      – Editor

      1. Obviously behind the times.

        The amici primum clause of the baptismal covenant is clear: “Except when people are nice to me in church. Then, I promise to criticize the victim with all my power, so help me God.”

    2. Welcome to Planet Clericalism, inhabited by the Logical Fallacians.

      1) Victims fear retribution and typically don’t speak out, on the grapevine or otherwise.
      2) Predators by definition manipulate public perception. Thus, Mr. Callahan’s observations are irrelevant when it comes to allegations involving one-on-one conduct.
      3) Typical TEC. Discredit the victim and show no concern for them.
      4) Unthinking reaction. Critics are essential if the church is to survive.
      5) Those who don’t take abuse seriously are morally bankrupt. Hello, Mr. Callahan.

      1. Kudos, Stinkbomb.

        I am a stipendiary deacon and a female who is been been a church worker for more than 30 years. During that time, I have faced abuse and harassment at every church where I have worked. My experience is that it is the norm, not the exception. I repeat. Every. Single. Church.

        Even worse, far too many face a difficult choice: To take the so-called high road and continue to serve the church. Or do what needs to be done, which is to call members of the patriarchy to account. Yes, you will lose you job and no one will take you seriously. But far too many abusers know that TEC invariably circles the wagons when corruption is involved.

        My experience is that the worst dioceses are the progressive ones. Nor is having a woman, a non-cis person, or someone LGBT as bishop or in senior positions any help. As someone else said in another post, DioMass and DioVa are especially bad. 815 is the worst.

        Anyone who brushes off allegations of abuse needs to stop reciting the baptismal covenant. I have zero patience for liars.

        My experience as a senior executive at IBM was very different. Both situations where I experienced misconduct were handled immediately and with integrity.

        My one complaint to TEC was handled abysmally. Despite written evidence, and multiple witnesses, my bishop told me that I am a liar and that if I brought it up again I would never again work in his diocese. He added that I am too pretty to be a deacon.

        My wife did not agree.

    3. Tellingly, neither Harper nor Callahan show any concern for the alleged victims.

      Typical. Utter lack of introspection.

    4. The reason the Episcopal Church is dying is illustrated perfectly here. Churchy-nice and clericalism have overrun Christian values. Nor do Paul and Patricia see any issue with their comments. They likely are going, “What got into those cranks?”

      That, dear friends, is the reason the church is imploding. Fortunately, we’re down to less than 20 years.

      Burn, baby, burn.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *